APS public access v. arXiv open access- We live in interesting times…
The following press release was forwarded to me by a colleague:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
APS ONLINE JOURNALS AVAILABLE FREE IN U.S. PUBLIC LIBRARIES
Ridge, NY, 28 July 2010: The American Physical Society (APS)
announces a new public access initiative that will give readers
and researchers in public libraries in the United States full use
of all online APS journals, from the most recent articles back to
the first issue in 1893, a collection including over 400,000
scientific research papers. APS will provide this access at no
cost to participating public libraries, as a contribution to
public engagement with the ongoing development of scientific
understanding.
APS Publisher Joseph Serene observed that “public libraries have
long played a central role in our country’s intellectual life,
and we hope that through this initiative they will become an
important avenue for the general public to reach our research
journals, which until now have been available only through the
subscriptions at research institutions that currently cover the
significant costs of peer review and online publication.”
Librarians can obtain access by accepting a simple online site
license and providing valid IP addresses of public-use computers
in their libraries
(http://librarians.aps.org/account/public_access_new). The
license requires that public library users must be in the library
when they read the APS journals or download articles. Initially
the program will be offered to U.S. public libraries, but it may
include additional countries in the future.
“The Public Library program is entirely consistent with the APS
objective to advance and diffuse the knowledge of physics,” said
Gene Sprouse, APS Editor in Chief. “Our goal is to provide access
to everyone who wants and needs our journals and this shift in
policy represents the first of several steps the APS is taking
towards that goal.”
–Contact: Amy Halsted,
Special Assistant to the Editor in Chief,
halsted@aps.org,
631-591-4232
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It is quite interesting to note the the field of Physics has a long-standing inclination to bypass the scholarly journal as a method of scholarly communication.
arXiv is one of the most visible and well-regarded open access repositories for Physics, Mathematics, Computer Science, Quantitative Biology, Quantitative Finance and Statistics. Its history actually pre-dates the electronic journal. Since 1991 researchers in these disciplines can post pre-print, pre-peer review versions of research openly, allowing colleagues and the international public to see and, for scientists, incorporate or test the results in their own labs. Just as the objects of devotion in particle physics move faster than the speed of light, research on particle physics just wants to be open, available, and shared as rapidly as possible.
APS and other publishers in these specialized research fields have been known to offer authors the convenience of manuscript submission that just involves downloading the arXiv pre-print, along with the step of asking authors to re-assign their copyright in the traditional copyright transfer procedure, through the directions for authors of APS journal articles. Still if you look at the copyright transfer agreement, authors retain the ability to post and use their articles in other ways, provided either the author asks for permission to use the APS-formatted version or simply uses their own pre-print version and notes a link to the APS-copyrighted version. In effect, arXiv continues to hold the attention of anyone in these data-driven research fields, and APS is fortunate to attract submissions. Then again, the global research community continues to desire the status of faculty tenure and appointments, and the journal article is more valuable for advancement than a non-peer reviewed arXiv submission, at least for those seeking academic status and prosperity.
arXiv has encountered its own survival moments over nearly two decades, as its growth overwhelmed the original support provided by Los Alamos National Laboratory. Cornell University took over hosting with support provided by the National Sciences Foundation. Recently, Cornell instituted a voluntary subscription model based on institutional usage by other universities, a 3-year plan going forward to find sustainability. The success of this joint-funding appeal is evidence of one model for institutional support of open access repositories in narrowly defined research fields.
Now we have a very different model of open access at public libraries promoted by APS. Any public library large enough to have a science librarian will probably immediately let their local school district(s) and colleges know that students have a new place to do physics research. Not that any public library could take this approach, but public library service demands are constant competition for even keeping web sites up to date, let alone obtaining access by filing a simple online site license and providing valid IP addresses of public-use computers in their libraries.
With this initial burst of publicity for APS public library access, it will be interesting to see how many public libraries register for this offer. Certainly the peer-reviewing improvements and editorial enhancements by APS will enhance the usability of articles online, compared to arXiv.
But arXiv offers immediate uninhibited access to the pulse of science, not limited to a library building. On any internet-enabled device. It is so 21st century.
PUBLIC ACCESS, OPEN ACCESS, AND PUBLIC INTEREST
The American Physical Society was the very first journal publisher to formally endorse author self-archiving. APS’s efforts to provide free public access at public libraries are yet another welcome historic contribution from this very progressive learned society publisher.
Public library access, however, is not enough: Scientific and scholarly research is conducted and published primarily by and for researchers, to be used and applied in further research for the benefit of the public that funds the research — not primarily to provide reading matter for the public, because most of the research is far too technical to be of any interest to the general public.
(1) From the outset, in 1991, physicists have been self-archiving in Arxiv not only their pre-peer-review preprints but also their peer-reviewed, revised postprints. Hence, all along, it has not been a matter of self-archiving in Arxiv OR publishing in a peer-reviewed journal but self-archiving in Arxiv AND publishing in a peer-reviewed journal, to ensure that access is both the earliest and the widest possible.
(2) It is not so much Los Alamos that supported Arxiv formerly, but NSF subsidy. Now it is Cornell plus voluntary institutional subsidies.
(3) Arxiv was an early, special case of open access, in the field of physics, motivated primarily by the research need for early access.
(3) Since then, the global open access movement across all disciplines has led to the creation if institutional repositories at most of the world’s major universities, thereby distributing the (locally modest) expense of self-archiving across the local providers of the research, which share with their authors the interest and benefits of maximizing access to their research output.
(5) Hence it is no longer necessary to find funds to subsidize central self-archiving repositories like Arxiv in other fields: authors can simply self-archive in their own institutional repository. Central harvesters of metadata like google scholar, scirus, citeseer, citebase, SCOPUS, (and perhaps eventually even Arxiv and PubMed Central) can then provide the means of seamless joint search and navigation across their globally distributed open access contents.
What is needed today from the world’s universities and research institutions is hence not subsidies to support central repositories but self-archiving mandates to ensure that their own researchers fill their own institutional repositories with all of their target content of the open access movement: peer-reviewed journal articles (after — and where desired, also before — peer review).
Stevan Harnad